"The Japanese are averse to change," avows Toshio Yamaki,
professor of Advertising at Tokyo Keizai University. It seems a harsh verdict. And one
that superficially goes against the grain of common sense in describing a country
apparently wedded to high tec innovation and production. Yet their is an amazing
resilience and stability in the countrys social and business systems. The same major
political parties, ministries, newspapers, that hold sway today were all bastions of
society twenty years ago. While technological change is encouraged, social change takes
place much more slowly, opines Yamaki.
"Weve seen relatively little change now for over
fifty years," says Yamaki. "For instance in Tokyo we have five national daily
newspapers who have continued
The media situation should change, but change is very
difficult. Historically, when change occurs in Japan, it usually takes powerful outside
pressure. Otherwise stability, the status quo, tends to persist. While many people talk of
a "big bang," creating all kinds of change we should not assume that this is a
forgone conclusion."
The professor makes a good point. When Rupert Murdoch, an
agent of change in many media markets descended on Japan to acquire 21.4% of Asahi TV in
June 1996, a chill wind blew through the boardrooms of many Japanese media companies. The
Japanese broadcasting market had never been exposed to foreign competition and
Murdochs reputation caused disquiet. For a brief while it appeared as if Murdoch and
his partner, Masayoshi Son of Softbank Ltd. might try to take control of the network and
start a media war. However staunch resistance at such a brash intrusion from the Asahi
Group forced him to sell the stake to the Asahi Shimbun as the price for securing any kind
of cooperation for JSkyB, his new satellite channel, in Japan. Subsequently, Murdoch
invited Fuji TV and Sony to join the project and this February proposed a merger between
JSkyB and PerfecTV, one of its main competitors who has been trying to build an audience
since 1996. In thereby minimizing risks, Murdoch has also ceded control and conceded that
Japan is a more difficult market than first appeared. Established terrestrial Japanese
broadcasters have greater control over both program production and the most popular sports
events than counterparts elsewhere, and so challenge the status quo is more expensive and
more difficult.
Though it now seems unlikely that foreign competitors can
rattle Japans media groups, the challenge remains of what to do with the hundreds of
new media channels that are already coming to a screen near you. For agencies, this brings
a challenge in media planning in understanding viewing patterns and relating these to
marketing plans for their clients. It is a change from a world of media scarcity to media
surplus, where successfully integrating the communication values of the new media with
those of the old will bring rewards for agencies and advertisers alike. But it also a
challenge that many Japanese agencies are unequal for. And so when Omnicom announced it
would be acquiring 20% of 8th ranked I&S Corporate earlier this year, there
were no protests from clients, media, or the advertising industry, though this was the
first such transaction involving a top ten agency. Most observers expect Omnicom to take
majority control of the agency within eighteen months. Theres a need for new
expertise in the advertising industry which can only come from overseas. Other major
agencies may also explore foreign partnerships afresh.
While Japan may be changing slowly, it is nonetheless
changing. "Over a couple of years, the changes will be well nigh imperceptible,"
says Yamaki. "But within ten years theyll become apparent and some will be
highly significant," he adds. Who then is best placed to take advantage of change.
Dentsu and Hakuhodo, Japans dominant agencies are safe bets, believes Yamaki. So too
is third ranked Asatsu, the only Japanese agency to grow consistently faster than the
market for twenty years. Among the media groups, the Asahi, Yomiuri, Nikkei, and
Fuji-Sankei groups are likely to continue as the industrys giants. While the giants
may decide the nature of the playing field, the gaps between them will provide new
opportunities for foreign players who are alert enough to spot them. In relative terms,
small opportunities but also viable and growing business where none existed before.