|
|
|
[What? New!] [Japan] [Healthy...] [Clean] [Techie] |
Fadfoods: trendy, fast, cheap and worthless. |
W h a t ... did I just eat?! |
All Natural, 100% natural, and so on. The less processed the food, the more it retains its nutritional value. Everyone seems to agree on this. Why would manufacturers tout their wares with slogans like "all natural" on foods that bear little resemblance with the way nature offered it? We’ll go into this a little deeper on this page. FAT FREE, LOWFAT, NON-FAT ... the stores in the USA are full of products with such labels.
And many of the customers in these stores look ... Hmm, no
discrimination, but it does not match. Per 1996 statistics, 75% of
the U.S. population are overweight, some 25% seriously so. I don’t think
the fat in the food or the trend to remove it influences obesity to a large
degree. I do agree that too much fat is not healthy, but how much is too
much? Think about it. What chemical tricks must be used to remove all fat
from a natural food?
Healthy Corn Flakes, Crispies, Pops, etc. A contradiction in terms. Just read the labels. Here, a major brand. It says: serving size 40g ... sugars 34g. Whoa! That is a whopping 85% refined sugar. Breakfast would be cheaper and almost as “healthy” if we emptied the sugar pot into the cereal bowl. The fractions of milligrams "vitamins added" are a shame against the vitamins in a slice of whole grain bread or other wholesome food. We pay a high price indeed for getting the nutrition processed out of our morning cereals. Oven Fresh Bakery: It looks and smells so great - but wait? How do they manage to bake all day in front of the customers? How do
they keep that delicious pastry dough for a day or more?
Will bake. Dough in a can is just a fake. Taste enhancer: where's the beef? Food prepared competently from clean ingredients and proper recipes is naturally tasty and nutritious. The use of taste enhancer is evidence the cooks skimp on the raw material or they hide faulty technique. If the food by itself does not suit your taste - well, don't eat it. Your sense of taste and smell is a protection against ingesting substances not compatible with your system. If it is palatable only with taste enhancer, caution! You may experience side effects because the taste enhancer works by flooding the brain with an unnaturally high dosage of an isolated amino acid (mono sodium glutamate, MSG). The long-term effects of accumulation in the brain are not well researched. MSG must be declared on food labels, but why on Earth do food companies try to hide it by using a multitude of names for the same taste enhancer? Is it because 30% of the population experience allergic reactions? Could it be the companies fear they would lose sales with an honest declaration contains MSG? Yuck! The open cup: Artificial Sweetener versus Sugar 0 - 0 A fair match. Both substances are refined chemicals devoid of nutritional
value. Sugar delivers a few empty calories that pull calcium and B-vitamins
out of somewhere in the body to turn the sugar into usable energy. Sweetener
provides not even that, only a similar taste and side effects, some severe.
|
|
In 1996, I wrote here:
I never posted an update, abundant information is available on the web
and you can verify a lot by cross-checking with your local library. If
you are already on the way to rebuilding your health, you may find you
can also trust your intuition.
|
|
|